A naukri.com initiative
Bitcoinmagazine
1M
389
Bitcoin vs Stablecoins: Bitcoin is an Unreplicable Lifeline in Authoritarian Regimes
- Bitcoin's unique value in humanitarian crises lies in its decentralized nature, vital for populations in authoritarian regimes like Nigeria, Afghanistan, and Venezuela.
- Nigeria's economic turmoil led citizens to turn to Bitcoin due to the collapse of the local currency and government restrictions on stablecoins.
- Bitcoin's decentralized design allowed Nigerians to bypass banking restrictions and sustain adoption during the economic crisis.
- Afghanistan faced banking system collapse after the Taliban takeover, with Bitcoin emerging as a vital tool for survival amid sanctions and financial constraints.
- In Afghanistan, stablecoins faltered due to frozen reserves and lack of dollar liquidity, while bitcoin thrived with its decentralized nature.
- Venezuela's hyperinflation crisis showcased how Bitcoin, not stablecoins, provided a financial lifeline for preserving wealth in a volatile economy.
- Stablecoins, tied to USD and susceptible to debasement, slowly erode wealth over time in hyperinflationary economies like Venezuela.
- Bitcoin's decentralized network makes it resilient against government restrictions, unlike stablecoins vulnerable to centralized regulation and control.
- Authoritarian regimes target stablecoin liquidity through bans, banking blockades, KYC enforcement, state-sponsored hacks, licensing restrictions, and surveillance.
- Bitcoin's antifragile nature makes it a strategic asset for evading sanctions in authoritarian regimes, while stablecoins lack the same resilience.
Read Full Article
23 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app