<ul data-eligibleForWebStory="true">Minimum Viable Product (MVP) focuses on building a basic version of the product to validate core functionality and attract early users.MVP's purpose is to test assumptions and learn from the market with minimal effort and resources.It emphasizes functionality, feasibility, and validating demand over delighting users.MVP is used when entering a new market, testing risky assumptions, or validating core functionality before a full product build.Pros of MVP include fast time to market and real user feedback, but cons may include lack of polish and potential low retention.Minimum Lovable Product (MLP) goes beyond functionality to include elements that make the product delightful and engaging.MLP aims to create an emotional connection and establish a loyal user base from early adopters.It combines core functionality with user experience and polish, focusing on user satisfaction from the beginning.MLP is recommended when user satisfaction, loyalty, or brand differentiation is crucial at the start.Pros of MLP involve increased user satisfaction, retention, and emotional connection, with cons including more time and resources required.MVP is beneficial for rapid testing and iteration, while MLP can drive early enthusiasm and brand loyalty.Both frameworks are valuable in different contexts, with MVP useful for quick validation and MLP powerful for building user loyalty.Illustrative examples for both MVP and MLP are provided using a ride-sharing app scenario.The article discusses the benefits and challenges of using MVP and MLP frameworks for product launches.Understanding when to use MVP or MLP can help companies choose the most suitable product launch strategy.Implementing the right framework can optimize resources, improve user satisfaction, and contribute to long-term success.