The article humorously describes startup entrepreneurs, particularly targeting the stereotypical 'startup bro' persona like Chad or Landon Nickerson, who boast of app ideas like 'Uber for dog yoga' or 'Tinder for artisanal kombucha' before their startups actually exist.
These entrepreneurs are portrayed as living in a fantasy world where buzzwords like 'disruption' and 'pivot' are thrown around, despite having little substance to show for their companies beyond a PowerPoint slide and a dream.
The concept of 'valuation' in the startup world is criticized, highlighting how entrepreneurs inflate their company's worth with fictional figures to attract investors, often without substantial revenue or assets.
Valuation is likened to a marketing tool used by startup bros to impress others, especially at trendy bars, but the article suggests that it's more about showmanship than actual financial success.
The article points out how startup bros use inflated valuations as pickup lines, targeting individuals who might not understand the intricacies of startup finance, and emphasizes the disparity between valuation figures and actual liquid assets.
It humorously critiques the practice of using startup valuations to impress others, suggesting that authenticity and honesty about the challenges of entrepreneurship would be more appealing than exaggerated numbers.
The message to women is to be cautious of individuals who lead with their startup's valuation, as it may not reflect actual financial stability, and advises asking about the company's revenue instead.
The article concludes with a humorous tone, acknowledging that while some entrepreneurs are genuinely building valuable companies, those who flaunt imaginary valuations are fair game for such playful criticism.