Agentic AI involves programming with natural language through large language models (LLMs) for automating tasks, allowing for more dynamic decision-making.
LLMs serve as a communication layer on top of structured systems and data sources, interpreting natural language but not inherently validating facts.
Agentic AI excels in interpreting nuanced language for tasks such as customer service and research but may not be ideal for structured tasks like precise calculations.
LangGraph, Agno, Mastra, and Smolagents are agentic AI frameworks worth exploring, with LangGraph being a popular choice among developers for building workflows.
Single-agent workflows involve one LLM accessing multiple tools to make decisions, while multi-agent workflows distribute tasks among different agents, offering more control and precision.
Single-agent setups are easier to start with but may lack precision for complex tasks, while multi-agent systems require careful architecture design for effective data flow and collaboration.
Using cheaper LLMs for most agents in a multi-agent system and reserving more advanced models for crucial tasks can help optimize costs and performance.
Building multi-agent workflows requires thoughtful architecture and data flow planning, with each agent responsible for specific tasks and interactions among different agents.
Improvements such as parsing user queries into structured formats, ensuring agents use tools effectively, enhancing summarization, handling errors, and implementing long-term memory can enhance workflow efficiency.
State management, particularly isolating short-term memory for each team or agent, is crucial for optimizing performance and cost in agentic systems.
Exploring different agentic workflows, such as single vs. multi-agent setups, can offer insights into the level of control, precision, and complexity achievable in automating tasks with AI.