Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS are two popular managed database solutions offered by AWS with distinct differences in architecture, performance, scalability, availability, pricing, and features.
Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database service compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL, offering high performance, fault-tolerant storage, auto-scaling, and automatic failover.
Amazon RDS is a managed SQL database service supporting multiple database engines, automating backups, scaling, and patching for MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, and Oracle.
Key differences between Amazon Aurora and RDS include performance, storage scalability, replication, failover, availability, backup, pricing, and database engine support.
Amazon Aurora outperforms RDS in terms of performance, storage scalability, automatic failover, and availability, but it comes at a higher cost.
While RDS is more cost-effective and versatile with support for multiple database engines, Aurora is ideal for enterprise-level workloads requiring high availability and superior performance.
Amazon Aurora's architecture is designed for the cloud with fault-tolerant storage, while RDS architecture resembles installing a database engine on an EC2 instance managed by AWS.
In conclusion, choose Amazon RDS for budget-friendly projects or multi-engine support, and opt for Amazon Aurora for high availability, scalability, and performance-demanding applications.
For small to medium applications or cost-sensitive projects, Amazon RDS is suitable, while Amazon Aurora is recommended for enterprise-level workloads, highly available applications, and read-intensive applications.
For applications requiring fault tolerance, auto-scaling, and global distribution, Amazon Aurora stands out as the superior choice between the two database services.