A naukri.com initiative
UX Design
2d
334
Image Credit: UX Design
Apple’s “liquid glass” isn’t just an accessibility blunder — it’s an environmental one too
- Apple's "liquid glass" design language sacrifices performance and longevity for visual flair, posing environmental concerns due to increased energy consumption.
- The heavy GPU processing required for these sleek effects drains battery life and strains devices unnecessarily, without offering functional benefits.
- The design in iOS relies on live blur and motion effects that demand more GPU usage.
- This GPU acceleration impact extends to webpages using backdrop-filter in CSS, increasing rendering workload and energy consumption.
- Apple's design choices can set troubling industry precedents, favoring aesthetics over usability, inclusivity, and sustainability.
- The focus on visual flair in digital design culture driven by Apple's trends may lead to less accessible and more resource-intensive interfaces.
- Prioritizing aesthetics over functional integrity could result in bloated interfaces that affect usability and energy efficiency negatively.
- The significance of energy draw and planetary scale usage in the context of digital design amid global decarbonization initiatives is emphasized.
- Rethinking interface design to prioritize sustainability, clarity, and performance over fleeting visual trends is crucial in an age of climate consciousness.
- Questioning the worth of implementing visually demanding UI elements becomes essential not just as a design choice but potentially as an ethical consideration.
Read Full Article
20 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app