Approaches to counterspeech detection have focused on binary classification and multi-label tasks, analyzing abuse and counterspeech in various contexts.
Counterspeech detection involves evaluating pre-trained language models for categorizing strategies across different languages.
Counterspeech generation methods center on transformer-based models, emphasizing aspects like efficacy, informativeness, multilinguality, politeness, and diversity.
Testing multiple decoding mechanisms, autoregressive models with stochastic decoding are found to offer optimal counterspeech generation.
Evaluation of counterspeech generation poses challenges due to the lack of clear criteria, relying on both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
Automatic metrics evaluate generation quality using linguistic criteria, novelty, and repetitiveness, while human evaluation focuses on aspects like suitableness and grammatical accuracy.
Counterspeech generation is seen as a newer research area that can complement content moderation efforts in addressing hate speech.
Challenges in counterspeech generation include ensuring faithfulness, avoiding toxic degeneration, and striking a balance between generalisation and specialisation.
Issues of data bias, unintended toxicity, and generalisability impact the effectiveness and ethical considerations of automated counterspeech generation.
Deploying counterspeech generation as suggestion tools alongside human moderation is advocated to assist in countering hate speech effectively.