When a potential client arrives with a strong CMS preference, understanding the reasons behind it is crucial, such as familiarity, content migration concerns, or lack of exposure to other platforms.
Evaluation of CMS options starts early, considering both client's editorial and end users' needs to recommend the right strategy.
Factors like design requirements, editorial workflows, organizational structures, and technical considerations play significant roles in CMS evaluation.
Technical aspects like performance, scalability, developer community, and tech stack are also key considerations during CMS evaluation.
The evaluation process involves collaboration and a deep understanding of project needs and constraints to find a CMS that fits well.
Commonly used CMS platforms include Wagtail, Statamic, and Payload, each offering unique strengths in terms of flexibility and content management.
Wagtail is suitable for complex editorial sites, Statamic excels in admin experience for static content, while Payload offers high customization potential.
Each CMS platform has its pros and cons, with considerations like customizability, scalability, content modeling, and ease of use guiding their selection.
Choosing the right CMS can significantly impact editorial team efficiency and content quality, aligning with the client's vision and goals.
The goal is to implement a CMS that enhances the editorial experience, allowing teams to focus on creating exceptional content.