ClickHouse and Apache Druid are popular open-source columnar databases for real-time analytics and big data, excelling in different use cases.
ClickHouse is ideal for high-speed OLAP workloads, while Druid is specialized for real-time, event-driven scenarios.
ClickHouse has a monolithic OLAP engine, whereas Druid has a distributed, modular architecture for ingestion and querying.
In performance benchmarks, ClickHouse often shows faster query times for OLAP workloads, while Druid excels in sub-second performance for real-time queries.
The feature comparison highlights differences in data ingestion, query latency, indexing, scaling, operational complexity, and cost between ClickHouse and Druid.
ClickHouse is preferred for historical analytics, ad-hoc reporting, and metrics, while Druid is suited for real-time dashboards and telemetry ingestion.
ClickHouse offers a lower total cost of ownership with efficient compression, whereas Druid's modular design leads to higher resource utilization.
The article provides guidance on choosing between ClickHouse and Druid based on specific needs like query latency, operational complexity, and real-time ingestion requirements.
Overall, both databases have strengths in different areas, with ClickHouse for batch-heavy analytics and Druid for real-time applications at scale.
The comparison data between ClickHouse and Apache Druid in the form of a CSV file is also presented for reference.