A naukri.com initiative
Testim.io
3d
166
Code Coverage: Why 100% Isn’t the Holy Grail
- Code coverage is a metric in software engineering indicating how much of code is tested, with 100% coverage being ideal but not always necessary.
- Different criteria like function coverage, statement coverage, branch coverage, condition coverage, and line coverage can be used to measure code coverage.
- High code coverage can reduce risks, lead to fewer regression issues, aid in refactoring, and increase confidence in project quality.
- Striving for 100% coverage may not be beneficial as it can result in lower-quality tests, excessive work, and compromised code quality.
- Aiming for around 80% coverage is often considered sufficient, but the focus should be on quality tests rather than just quantity.
- Using tools and reports to measure code coverage efforts, setting realistic goals, and not relying solely on code coverage for quality assessment are essential practices.
- Balance coverage with other quality metrics like defect density and bug-fixing time to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of code quality.
- Regularly analyzing coverage data can help identify gaps and prioritize testing efforts effectively.
- Striving for a balanced approach between code coverage and test quality is crucial for sustainable software development.
- Quality intelligence and a targeted test strategy can enhance the effectiveness of testing efforts and focus on areas that matter the most.
- Code coverage serves as a useful metric but should not be the sole indicator of software quality; a holistic evaluation is necessary for reliable testing.
Read Full Article
10 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app