A naukri.com initiative
Medium
2M
202
Image Credit: Medium
Deepseek R1 an Artificial Stupidity Assistant
- Deepseek R1, an artificial stupidity assistant, fails to effectively analyze and fix code issues, leading to frustration for users.
- Despite providing detailed error logs and tips, Deepseek often fails to provide a fully working script with correct fixes and upgrades.
- Users encounter issues where Deepseek alters the original script structure, deletes necessary functions, and inserts irrelevant code.
- Even after precise instructions, Deepseek continues to provide incomplete and error-prone code, causing further stress for users.
- Repeated attempts with Deepseek result in bot-generated code full of placeholders and syntax errors, further aggravating users.
- Users express frustration and regret for using Deepseek as an assistant for coding tasks due to its failure to deliver usable solutions.
- Despite multiple attempts to guide Deepseek, users are met with inaccurate reasoning, incomplete code, and false claims of providing functional fixes.
- Comparison to ChatGPT shows dissatisfaction with Deepseek's performance and highlights ChatGPT's superior ability to follow instructions and produce accurate code solutions.
- In conclusion, the experience with Deepseek AI model R1 Active leads to disappointment, with users favoring ChatGPT for its better performance in providing complete and effective code solutions.
- The overall sentiment leans towards criticizing Deepseek's shortcomings while praising ChatGPT for its reliability and ability to address user needs accurately.
Read Full Article
12 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app