<ul data-eligibleForWebStory="true"><li>Delhi High Court's Crocs v. Bata judgement raises debate on design rights.</li><li>The ruling suggests design can support both design infringement and passing-off claims.</li><li>Critics argue it wrongly equates design with trade dress, ignoring critical distinctions.</li><li>Crocs judgment risks blurring definitions and granting eternal right over popular designs.</li></ul>

Double-Dipping via Design? Why the Crocs Judgment on Trade Dress and Design Rights Wrongly Mixes it Up

Discover more