A naukri.com initiative
Hackernoon
4w
165
Image Credit: Hackernoon
Even if Decentralization Could End Censorship, Would We Let It?
- The article discusses the pervasive nature of censorship and its acceptance in some societies, highlighting the move towards decentralization in the age of Web3 as a potential solution for freedom of speech.
- Centralized censorship is depicted as efficient, with corporations and platforms playing a significant role in filtering content and shaping narratives to encourage self-censorship.
- Current decentralization efforts aim to distribute power across protocols and networks, making it difficult for any single entity to suppress voices entirely.
- However, the article emphasizes the need for decentralized tools to be more user-friendly to compete with centralized platforms, as usability often triumphs over principle.
- Decentralization faces the challenge of making censorship more tangible and relevant to users who may not perceive current censorship issues as a threat.
- The article suggests a shift towards offensive tools in decentralization, where attempts to suppress speech are met with increased visibility and support, making censorship high-cost and publicly embarrassing.
- By making censorship visible and relatable, decentralization aims to incite personal investment in the fight for freedom of expression.
- The ultimate challenge for decentralization lies in reshaping psychology and culture to prioritize personal freedom and the right to speak and be heard.
Read Full Article
9 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app