IntelyCare, a platform connecting nurses with work opportunities, faced challenges in hiring nurses during the 2020-2021 global pandemic.
To attract candidates, they considered offering a $100 bonus for completing the first shift, but decided to run an experiment instead of implementing it directly.
The experiment involved randomly offering bonuses ranging from $0 to $100 in increments of $25 to applicants, with thousands of participants at each bonus level.
Analyzing the data, they found that the effectiveness of bonuses varied between nurses and nursing assistants.
Nursing assistants were more likely to start working with any bonus amount, whereas nurses were less likely to start working with a bonus.
After considering multiple comparisons, they discovered that the applicant's role as a nurse or nursing assistant was a significant dimension affecting the bonus impact.
The study revealed that for nursing assistants, smaller bonuses had a more significant effect initially, while for nurses, no bonus proved to be more effective.
Based on the findings, IntelyCare decided to do away with bonuses for nurses and opted for a $25 bonus for nursing assistants.
This approach saved them from spending an extra $1 million in bonuses while still achieving the desired recruitment outcomes.
The experiment highlighted the importance of testing and data analysis in making informed decisions, especially in marketing strategies.