Figma Sites, a new tool by Figma, is discussed in terms of its focus on superficial qualities over web accessibility.While Figma Sites offers efficiency and speed in building websites, concerns are raised about its lack of emphasis on accessibility.Despite being in beta, Figma Sites overlooks critical aspects of web accessibility like semantic HTML and meaningful tags.The tool fails to alert users about untagged elements or missing alt text, impacting the accessibility of content blocks.Criticism includes Figma Sites' use of generic <div> elements that compromise accessibility and its failure to generate usable web content.The article suggests that Figma should prioritize inclusivity by fostering environments that encourage ethical and inclusive content creation.The author expresses disappointment in Figma's prioritization of quick production over meaningful design considerations and inclusivity.Ultimately, the critique emphasizes the need for tools like Figma to promote accessibility and inclusive design principles.The article credits Adrian Roselli for discussing Figma Sites' accessibility and urges readers to explore accessible HTML resources.In conclusion, Figma Sites is questioned for its lack of accountability in promoting ethical and inclusive web content creation.