Applying safeguards to AI agents is critical in reducing errors, waste, legal exposure, or harm when agents operate autonomously.
Using determinism and defined rules to trigger human intervention decreases the risk of noncompliant behavior while keeping autonomous agents operational.
Agents can be paired up with a checking agent that verifies for unethical or risky behavior, giving a go-ahead to proceed or not.
Multi-agent systems require different testing, monitoring, sandboxing, and fine-tuning regimes to operate safely within large organizations.
Inconsistencies in LLM-based agents are compensated for using fine-tuning and generative AI techniques while protecting against overloading agents with detailed instructions.
Agents benefit from being divided into multiple connected agents to mitigate problems stemming from tailspins, where agents perpetually communicate, and ambiguous definitions of roles and purposes.
Defining workflows as pipelines can reduce complexity by eliminating the coordinator agent, creating better-defined roles, and reducing the chance of a single point of failure.
Multi-agent systems should be built with the intention of including generic placeholder tools to bootstrap and operationalize agents in an agile manner.
Context management in multilevel communication chains needs to be managed to reduce transport overload and confusion over target purposes.
There is a high bar for LLMs used as agent brains, which necessitates cost and speed considerations when creating and implementing multi-agent systems at scale.