menu
techminis

A naukri.com initiative

google-web-stories
Home

>

Robotics News

>

How OpenAI...
source image

Unite

3d

read

303

img
dot

Image Credit: Unite

How OpenAI’s o3, Grok 3, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.7 Differ in Their Reasoning Approaches

  • Large language models are advancing from text prediction systems to reasoning engines, solving complex challenges through advanced reasoning techniques.
  • The development of reasoning techniques allows AI models like OpenAI's o3, Grok 3, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet to process information logically.
  • Reasoning techniques include Inference-Time Compute Scaling, Pure Reinforcement Learning (RL), Pure Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), and RL+SFT.
  • Inference-Time Compute Scaling enhances reasoning by allocating extra computational resources without structural changes, beneficial for tasks requiring deep thought.
  • Pure Reinforcement Learning trains models through trial and error, mimicking human learning processes but can be computationally demanding.
  • Pure Supervised Fine-Tuning trains models on labeled datasets for efficient reasoning replication, but its success heavily depends on data quality.
  • Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Fine-Tuning combines stability and adaptability for effective problem-solving while requiring more resources than pure supervised fine-tuning.
  • OpenAI's o3 uses Inference-Time Compute Scaling for precise results in complex tasks but at the cost of higher inference costs and slower response times.
  • Grok 3 by xAI combines computational scaling with specialized hardware for real-time applications like financial analysis, excelling in speed and accuracy.
  • DeepSeek R1 employs Pure Reinforcement Learning initially and later incorporates Supervised Fine-Tuning for adaptability, making it cost-effective and flexible.

Read Full Article

like

18 Likes

For uninterrupted reading, download the app