Analyzing 100 tech lead portfolios, certain projects consistently raised red flags for hiring managers and interviewers.
Red flags included over-engineered todo list apps, self-created frameworks, technology checklist projects, complex algorithm implementations, and straightforward clones of existing apps.
Recruiters often viewed over-engineered todo list apps as a sign of poor engineering judgment, preferring projects with real-world value and complexity.
Self-created frameworks, if neglected, raised concerns about stability and commitment, with recruiters valuing honesty about project maintenance.
Simply implementing trending technologies without relevance to the problem at hand signaled potential issues with prioritization and decision-making to recruiters.
Complex algorithm implementations without practical application could indicate a lack of focus on business impact, according to hiring managers.
Building clones of existing applications, without innovation or personal contribution, suggested a lack of creativity to recruiters.
Projects that impressed hiring managers included those enhancing developer workflows, performance optimization, open source contributions, and clear problem-solving with measurable outcomes.
Thoughtful performance analysis, consistent open source contributions, articulating business solutions, and completing side projects with clear scope were highly valued.
To strengthen a tech lead portfolio, focus on thoughtful documentation, demonstrating leadership qualities in projects, and maintaining transparency about project statuses.