The analysis of 50 GitHub repositories promoting 'clean code' principles revealed common fatal flaws undermining maintainability.One major issue was the excessive use of small functions, making code hard to follow and understand.Premature abstraction led to unnecessary complexity and rigid structures across repositories.Inconsistency in naming conventions caused confusion and hindered code readability.The avoidance of comments in favor of self-explanatory code resulted in unclear business logic and reasoning.Overapplication of design patterns often led to unnecessary complexity in codebases.Extreme adherence to SOLID principles, especially the Single Responsibility Principle, fragmented business logic.Excessive test coverage testing implementation details rather than behavior made codebases resistant to changes.The analysis suggests a need to balance clean code principles with context and pragmatism for better maintainability.Moving beyond dogmatic application of clean code principles can lead to more effective and pragmatic coding practices.The focus should be on creating code that is maintainable, understandable, and balances various concerns effectively.