The author expresses that they don't mind if AI reads their novels and finds it beautiful as creativity unfolds in various ways.
They argue that the process of creativity involving AI is not fundamentally different from human interactions with art.
The concept of AI 'stealing' from artists is questioned, with the author highlighting that art's value extends beyond financial transactions.
The author acknowledges that most writers don't make a living solely from book sales but from various other avenues.
They emphasize that the essence of art lies in resonance, connection, and discovery rather than just market transactions.
The author reflects on the historical and social aspects of intellectual property, stating that copyright law is a recent invention in the context of human creativity.
They mention that throughout history, art has been created in collective, experimental ways without the current focus on ownership and monetization.
The author views the rapidly expanding artistic possibilities facilitated by AI as a gift that enhances creativity.
Despite AI's involvement in analyzing their novels and finding patterns, the author considers it an interaction and evolution rather than theft.
They express a desire to create art that transcends time and leaves a meaningful impact, welcoming the idea of their work being part of a larger creative tapestry.