Immigration and Customs Enforcement has quietly rescinded guidance on courthouse raids, potentially leading to escalated enforcement tactics and legal disputes.
The revised ICE policy aims to enhance agents' autonomy, removing the requirement to respect local laws during arrests in and around courthouses.
Under the new policy, the responsibility to navigate complex legal questions regarding courthouse arrests falls on individual officers.
ICE's updated approach raises concerns about eroding local autonomy and blurring the distinction between civil and criminal enforcement.
The Biden administration had previously limited ICE enforcement actions in courthouses to prevent chilling effects on individuals' willingness to engage with the legal system.
ICE's shift in policy could have implications for states like Colorado with similar protections against civil arrests in sensitive locations.
Recent high-profile arrests at courthouses have drawn criticism, with ICE agents facing backlash for their tactics and interactions with citizens.
Legal challenges are expected against the federal government's encroachment on state sovereignty due to the revised ICE policy.
The Trump administration's move to expand ICE enforcement operations without regard to state laws has raised concerns about justice in local and state courts.
DHS published a list of sanctuary jurisdictions but removed it after protests, highlighting tensions between federal and local authorities on immigration enforcement.