Indian VCs are adopting patient capital approach, investing in early-stage growth companies for the long term, unlike the fast-paced market norm.
Around 2010-2011, early VCs in India focused on quick returns rather than patient capital, driven by overseas LPs and a playbook of rapid scaling and exits in 3-5 years.
Exceptions like Blume Ventures and a few Indian family offices embraced patient capital early on; funds relied heavily on foreign investors initially.
Patient capital in India began with philanthropic funding, evolved into a structured category, especially in sectors like cleantech & deeptech.
The shift towards patient capital has led to more domestic LPs investing in early-stage startups, although foreign LPs still dominate funding.
The concept of patient capital faces challenges in a VC ecosystem built for quick returns and requires a strategic shift towards longer investment horizons.
Patient capital is crucial for sectors like agritech and electric mobility but clashes with short-term return expectations from LPs.
Investors highlight the importance of aligning founder and LP expectations, managing illiquidity concerns, and structuring funds for progressive liquidity to make patient capital work.
Increasing domestic LP participation in long-term bets requires policy support, alignment with startup objectives, and a shift towards viewing venture capital as a structured asset class.
Despite challenges, there is a gradual shift towards patient capital in India, emphasizing the need for a deeper domestic pool of patient capital for sustainable growth.
The evolving landscape of Indian VCs signals a move towards patient capital, driven by a growing focus on long-term investments and the imperative for domestic LPs to support innovation and growth.