The article discusses the mathematical model behind the 37% rule strategy in the Best Choice Problem.It builds upon the simulation-based methods from the previous article to explain the theoretical values through probability theory.The focus is on guessing the position of the largest number in a sequence rather than its actual value.The strategy involves observing a range of numbers, using the largest seen as a benchmark, and deciding based on available information.Probability calculations are used to quantify the success rate of this strategy across different observation ranges.The optimal observation range is found to be 37% for a 100-element sequence, resulting in a 37% success rate.The mathematical derivation leads to the key value of 1/e (approximately 37%) as the optimal observation range for maximizing success.The article explains how the 37% rule is a common occurrence in mathematical models and converges to e or 1/e in various contexts.The theoretical rates based on the calculation align closely with simulation-based results for different sequence sizes.As the sequence size increases, the success rate converges more closely towards 1/e, demonstrating the universality of the 37% rule.