Iran imposes a crypto curfew following a $90 million hack on Nobitex, Iran's largest crypto exchange.
The hack is believed to be linked to Gonjeshke Darande, a pro-Israel hacking group known for cyber operations against Iranian infrastructure.
The curfew is seen as a cybersecurity measure to reduce exposure during off-peak hours when foreign attacks are more likely.
Authorities hope to enhance oversight and lower systemic risk by restricting trading to standard business hours.
This policy contrasts with global norms of decentralized and round-the-clock crypto trading.
Critics view the curfew as regressive in terms of market openness and technological advancement.
The restrictions in Iran could have significant impacts on both retail and institutional traders, raising concerns about cybersecurity weaknesses and state control.
User trust in local platforms may decline due to reduced access windows compared to international exchanges.
The situation highlights the intersection of geopolitics, cybersecurity, and financial innovation in the digital age.
Iran's move underlines the delicate balance between risk mitigation and market freedom.
The article discusses the impact and implications of the crypto curfew in Iran after the Nobitex hack.
It also mentions concerns about how state controls could affect crypto adoption and user trust.
The cybersecurity measure is aimed at mitigating cyber threats during vulnerable off-peak hours.
The curfew is a departure from the decentralized nature of the global crypto market.
Authorities emphasize the need for greater protection in the crypto sector.
The story highlights the interconnected nature of geopolitics, cybersecurity, and financial innovation.