The debate on the nature of meaning, whether objective or subjective, has a long history in philosophy.A recent scientific paper from Cornell University reveals that different AI language models converge towards the same geometric structure of meaning.This discovery echoes Plato's Theory of Forms, suggesting a universal structure beyond individual instances.AI language models use embeddings to represent concepts as points in multidimensional space, showing semantic relationships.Different AI models, trained independently, organize meaning similarly, suggesting an underlying universal structure.The discovery enables translating embeddings between models, raising both technical possibilities and security concerns.The implications go beyond engineering, raising philosophical questions about the nature of meaning and its objectivity.It challenges the belief in cultural construction of meaning and intersects with ongoing debates like gender ideology.The study suggests deep structural constraints in how meanings are organized, hinting at cognitive, logical, or even ontological regularities.The discovery poses a paradox between relativism and universals, hinting at a geometric foundation for meaning inherent in our representations.While offering new insights, it also poses risks in terms of understanding and potentially controlling the semantic space of intelligences.