A naukri.com initiative
Towards Data Science
1M
152
Image Credit: Towards Data Science
Linear Regression in Time Series: Sources of Spurious Regression
- Econometric textbooks often warn about autocorrelated errors in time series data, yet many published papers still exhibit this issue.
- Autocorrelation in economics and finance variables can lead to misleading results if not appropriately addressed, as seen in Granger and Newbold’s research.
- Understanding the pitfalls of spurious regression is crucial for economists, data scientists, and analysts working with time series data.
- The article discusses random walk and ARIMA(0,1,1) processes as well as provides insights from Granger and Newbold's study on nonsense regressions.
- The Linear Regression model and F-test for the contribution of independent variables in explaining the dependent variable are also explained in the context of time series.
- Misinterpretations can occur when coefficients in regressions are invalid due to autocorrelation issues, as shown in the explanations provided.
- Granger and Newbold's simulations demonstrate how including unnecessary variables, like random walks, can lead to misleading regression results.
- High R² and low Durbin-Watson values do not necessarily signify a genuine relationship between variables but could indicate a spurious one.
- To avoid spurious regressions, it is crucial to identify and address autocorrelation in residuals using tests like Durbin-Watson or Portmanteau test.
- Specification errors in regression, such as omission of relevant variables or inclusion of irrelevant ones, can contribute to spurious regressions.
Read Full Article
8 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app