A naukri.com initiative
StartupDaily
3d
287
Looking at both sides of the Australian government’s plan to ban under-16s from social media, it’s more complicated than I first thought as a parent
- Australia's proposed legislation would ban children under 16 from social media platforms, prompting debate among critics and supporters of the move.
- Critics believe the law puts too much power in the hands of the government, with others arguing that age-appropriate digital education is a more effective solution.
- Supporters of the ban argue that social media companies are not doing enough to self-regulate, and that the government has the responsibility to protect young people online.
- While social media can be both a sanctuary and a minefield for young people, navigating this tension responsibly is no small task.
- Australia's proposed legislation may not be flawless—no single policy will capture the complexity of young people’s digital lives.
- It raises questions and seeks to put pressure on Big Tech to finally take younger users’ wellbeing seriously.
- It is a call for everyone – parents, educators, governments, and tech platforms alike – to work towards an online ecosystem that protects young people without isolating them from the connection and support they may desperately need.
- Commercial pressures on tech companies and social platforms are necessary to deliver real change.
- The legislation may not be the solution in itself, but it encourages everyone to keep working towards making social media safe for younger users.
- It’s a balance we haven’t yet figured out - kids need safety, but they also need community and compassion.
Read Full Article
17 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app