As French workers protest Macron's plan to raise state pension age, the IMF suggests older workers should delay retirement to balance public finances amid aging population pressures.
The IMF cited improved cognitive function and physical health of older individuals, advocating for delayed retirement and reduced early retirement benefits to address fiscal challenges.
Response to the proposal was divided, with many expressing outrage at the idea of working later in life, especially for those in physically demanding or low-paid jobs.
Critics argued that older workers have already contributed to the system and should not bear the burden of economic challenges alone, calling for government reconsideration of financial allocations.
Suggestions included limiting immigration, reducing support for asylum seekers, and cutting benefits for non-working younger individuals before impacting retirement age.
Concerns were raised about the impact of extended working years on social care and childcare responsibilities, pointing out the strain on older individuals serving as unpaid caregivers.
Ageism in the job market was highlighted as a barrier to older workers wanting to prolong their careers, with discrimination seen as a significant obstacle in implementing retirement delay policies.
Some individuals embraced the idea of working longer for personal, financial, and societal reasons, noting the benefits of staying active and engaged in work later in life.
Amid varying perspectives on retirement age, the affordability of retirement was questioned due to increasing living costs, prompting individuals to reconsider traditional notions of retirement.
Examples were shared of individuals who continued to work past traditional retirement ages, citing personal satisfaction, financial need, and a desire to remain engaged as reasons for their choice.