The US House's Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) has banned WhatsApp from all government devices used by congressional staffers over security concerns.
Concerns cited include lack of transparency in data protection and absence of stored data encryption, raising potential security risks.
The ban applies to all versions of WhatsApp, including mobile app, desktop app, and web browser versions.
Staffers with WhatsApp on House-managed devices will be contacted to remove the app.
Meta disagrees with the ban, emphasizing WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption for user messages.
The CAO mentions that other communication platforms like Microsoft Teams, Wickr, Signal, iMessage, and FaceTime are still viable alternatives.
WhatsApp ban is a result of concerns over user data protection and potential security risks.
US Congress workers have been asked to remove WhatsApp from their devices.
The ban comes after the Scottish government also prohibited WhatsApp use, favoring other messaging apps.
Meta expressed strong disagreement with the House Chief Administrative Officer’s ban.
The ban on WhatsApp aligns with previous tech restrictions for US government workers, such as Chinese platforms and certain AI tools.
The ban is not related to geopolitical tensions but stems from data protection and encryption concerns.
Concerns over lack of transparency and stored data encryption led to the decision to ban WhatsApp.
Other CAO-approved apps like Microsoft Teams, Wickr, Signal, iMessage, and FaceTime are considered safer alternatives.
The news follows a trend of banning certain apps within government settings to address security and data protection concerns.