Microfrontends usage has dropped from 75.4% to 23.6%, indicating a healthy market correction.
85% of teams implement microfrontends for wrong reasons, focusing on technical rather than organizational problems.
They are effective for enterprises with 15+ developers in 3+ teams, while startups may benefit more from a monolith with good architecture.
Key challenges include dependency version conflicts, CSS isolation failures, and performance regressions.
Successful microfrontend implementation was seen in a multi-brand sports platform scenario, enabling quick deployments and team autonomy.
Failed cases often involve premature optimization without facing actual scaling issues, leading to a return to monolith structures.
Recommendations emphasize monitoring distributed frontends, smart Module Federation setup, and performance optimization for successful microfrontend deployment.
Criteria for considering microfrontends include team size, release schedules, DevOps capabilities, and adherence to Conway's Law.
Future trends include server components with microfrontends, edge-side composition using CDN solutions, and AI-driven architecture analysis.
In conclusion, microfrontends should be employed judiciously, focusing on solving organizational scaling challenges rather than technical complexities.