When beginning a new development project, decisions must be made regarding the choice of architecture, programming language, infrastructure, and more.
Factors like scalability, resilience, low coupling, and ease of maintenance are now critical architectural concerns.
Microservices have gained popularity for their flexibility and independence, while monolithic approaches are simpler initially but may become cumbersome as the system expands.
The article discusses practical criteria to help evaluate whether microservices or monolith architecture is better suited for a project before complexity compromises agility and value.
Key technical considerations include system complexity, scalability, team expertise, deployment frequency, maintenance, resilience, development time, and initial cost.
Microservices are recommended for applications spanning multiple domains or requiring horizontal scalability, while monoliths may be suitable for smaller projects or teams with limited experience.
Business considerations such as time-to-market, initial vs. long-term cost, growth expectations, product flexibility, compliance, and security also play a crucial role in choosing the right architecture.
There is no universal answer, and the choice between microservices and monoliths should align with the project's specific needs, priorities, and business goals.
Ultimately, the selected architecture should maximize business value and efficiency in delivering the solution, considering both technical and business contexts.