A naukri.com initiative
Unite
4d
162
Image Credit: Unite
Monetizing Research for AI Training: The Risks and Best Practices
- Scholarly publishers have started to monetize their research content to provide training data for large language models (LLMs).
- Major academic publishers, including Wiley, Taylor & Francis, and others, have reported substantial revenues from licensing their content to tech companies developing generative AI models.
- Risks arise when questionable research infiltrates these AI training datasets, as the scholarly community is no stranger to issues of fraudulent research.
- The implications are profound when LLMs train on databases containing fraudulent or low-quality research. Such models could perpetuate inaccuracies, posing harmful consequences for fields like medicine.
- Publishers must improve their peer-review process to catch unreliable studies before they make it into training datasets.
- Choosing publishers and journals with a strong reputation for high-quality, well-reviewed research is key in reducing the risks of flawed research disrupting AI training.
- AI tools themselves can also be designed to identify suspicious data and reduce the risks of questionable research spreading further.
- Transparency is an essential factor, and publishers and AI companies should openly share details about how research is used and where royalties go.
- Open access to high-quality research should be encouraged to ensure inclusivity and fairness in AI development.
- By focusing on reliable, well-reviewed research, we can build better AI tools, protect scientific integrity, and maintain the public’s trust in science and technology.
Read Full Article
9 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app