A naukri.com initiative
Medium
1d
170
Image Credit: Medium
MVP vs MLP: Why a Minimum Viable Product Is Not Enough in 2025
- An MVP (Minimum Viable Product) was popularized by Eric Ries in The Lean Startup to test hypotheses quickly and affordably.
- Past MVP success was due to forgiving users, less digital market competition, and the emphasis on speed over product refinement.
- However, with changing landscapes, cheaper development costs, and higher user expectations, traditional MVPs can feel underwhelming in 2025.
- Factors like sky-high UX standards, saturated competition, accessible technology, and irreversible first impressions play a role in this shift.
- MLP (Minimum Lovable Product) is suggested for modern use cases in 2025 - focusing on solving key problems and evoking emotional connections to build loyalty.
- MLP aims to deliver quality in a slim package, prioritizing user love over basic functionality, setting it apart from traditional MVPs.
- While MVP tests if an idea can work, MLP ensures users will keep loving and using the product.
- MLP may require more upfront investment but can yield powerful returns by creating beloved products from the start.
- In 2025, success lies in creating lovable products from the outset, focusing on user care and emotional resonance.
- Building Minimum Lovable Products is essential in today's competitive market to inspire user loyalty and long-term success.
Read Full Article
10 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app