An AI debate with over 10 million views on YouTube showcased diverging viewpoints on the impact of agentic AI.Participants included Amjad Masad, Daniel Priestley, and Bret Weinstein, each presenting unique perspectives.Masad and Priestley were optimistic about AI's potential to empower individuals and transform industries.Weinstein, on the other hand, raised concerns about the unpredictability and risks of AI systems.The debate emphasized the importance of how humans utilize AI technology rather than just its capabilities.The discussion highlighted the evolving role of AI in various fields, showcasing how ordinary individuals are leveraging AI tools.While polarization was evident in the debate, the author stresses the significance of nuance and intention in AI's application.The article argues for a more realistic and balanced approach to harnessing the potential of AI while maintaining human agency.It calls for storytelling and ethical considerations in AI development to safeguard against negative consequences.Ultimately, the responsibility lies with humans to govern AI wisely and ensure it benefits society as a whole.The article advocates for a nuanced understanding of AI's impact and highlights the need for informed decision-making in its implementation.