Disaster recovery focuses on restoring data and systems after a disruptive event while backups simply preserve data against data loss.
Six factors impact the decision-making process of selecting the right backup and disaster recovery (DR) solution.
The primary goal of backups is to protect against data loss, while DR restores entire systems and applications so that business operations can resume as quickly as possible after a disruptive event.
When designing a backup or disaster recovery (DR) solution, architects must determine whether the client needs a Backup solution, a Disaster Recovery solution, or both to avoid costly misalignments.
AWS-native tools offer seamless integration and a comprehensive suite of tools. Third-party solutions provide advanced capabilities and flexibility, catering to specific use cases like hybrid environments or complex recovery requirements.
Clients rely on architects to present comprehensive and unbiased recommendations. Demonstrating knowledge of both AWS-native and third-party options positions architects as a trusted advisor.
In part three, the remaining four key considerations: RPO/RTO requirements, physical versus virtual servers, scheduling and automation, and the choice between on-premises and cloud restores will be discussed.
Choosing the appropriate tools and processes to meet an organization’s recovery objectives is highly influenced by understanding the trade-offs of the available options.
Finally, overdesigning for backups can be unnecessarily complex and expensive, while underestimating recovery needs can result in prolonged downtime and significant business losses.
Having a clear understanding of the differences between Backup and DR, and evaluating AWS-native versus third-party solutions are foundational factors for an effective backup or DR solution.