menu
techminis

A naukri.com initiative

google-web-stories
Home

>

Web Design

>

Open AI “G...
source image

Medium

4d

read

207

img
dot

Image Credit: Medium

Open AI “Ghibli-style” — A prime example of Human-AI interactions going wrong

  • The emergence of 'Ghibli-style' AI-generated images sparked a polarized response on social media, with some praising the artistry and others criticizing the new capabilities of ChatGPT (Dall-E).
  • Concerns have been raised about copyrights surrounding the generated images, with the US Copyright Office stating that the styled images are not copyrightable unless a human artistic touch is added.
  • OpenAI's policies restrict the use of work by living artists but allow for broader studio styles to be used, leading to debates on circumventing copyrights and policy restrictions.
  • The lack of human reasoning and contextualization in AI interactions has been highlighted, especially in cases like prompting for 'Ghibli style' images without considering the origins and implications.
  • AI-generated images often involve post-processing real photos to resemble animations, raising concerns about privacy, copyrights, and unintended future uses of these manipulated images.
  • The debate extends to comparing sharing AI images to posting on social media, with distinctions drawn on visibility, copyright protections, and implications for those depicted in the images.
  • Issues of privacy and user experience are brought into focus, highlighting the need for AI systems to prioritize user-centered design and incorporate human capabilities and vulnerabilities into their operations.
  • Current AI systems often lack user-centric design considerations, emphasizing the importance of educating users on AI capabilities and ethical usage while also holding AI systems accountable for guiding and safeguarding users.
  • The article underscores the importance of reevaluating how AI systems interact with users, particularly in terms of user input, potential misuse of outputs, and system accountability for handling generated content.
  • In conclusion, the article critiques the shortcomings in Human-AI interaction design, using the example of ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli-inspired images to highlight the failures in AI system capabilities and user experience.
  • The author acknowledges human fallibility in writing the article and stresses the need for a cautious and informed approach to navigate the complexities of AI interactions and their implications.

Read Full Article

like

12 Likes

For uninterrupted reading, download the app