The article discusses revisiting performance in Ruby 3.4.2 and addresses feedback received on a previous article focusing on the usage of Structs and Classes.
Initial observations favored Structs over Classes in some scenarios, but further benchmarking revealed that Classes are now faster than Structs in most cases.
Benchmarking code from the Alchemist's article was used to compare performance between different data structures like Arrays, Hashes, Classes, Structs, and Data.
Results showed that in real-life scenarios, Classes outperformed Structs, with Data objects being more performant than both when dealing with 10 attributes.
Stringified Hashes were noted to perform well under the frozen string literal comment, and using primitive data objects like Arrays and Hashes is recommended for larger datasets.
The article emphasized that Structs and Data objects serve as value objects, allowing for direct comparison, unlike Class instances.
The conclusion highlights the performance priority order of data structures and advises using frozen string literal comments and prioritizing Arrays or Hashes for larger datasets.