Signal is a widely trusted messaging app, but understanding its vulnerabilities beyond encryption is crucial for activists and journalists.
Signal's centralized servers in the US make it subject to US laws, potentially exposing data to legal demands like National Security Letters.
The closed-source spam filter in Signal introduces a trust element, deviating from the open-source security principle.
Signal Desktop poses security risks with unencrypted attachments, database key vulnerabilities, and potential exposure of data on the hard drive.
Metadata like delivery receipts and jurisdictional issues raise concerns for activists and journalists using Signal.
The funding origins of Signal and governance connections raise questions about independence and susceptibility to influence.
Security threats like device compromise and adversaries using spyware like Pegasus highlight the limitations of encrypted communication tools.
For high-risk users, minimizing desktop use, protecting data at rest, verifying safety numbers, and utilizing secure devices are essential practices.
Signal's encryption protects message content in transit, but considerations like metadata, jurisdiction, and spyware risks must be part of the security analysis.
Balancing Signal's strengths with its vulnerabilities, especially in high-risk scenarios, requires a comprehensive security strategy beyond relying solely on the app.