The scandal known as SignalGate involving a Signal group chat mistakenly including The Atlantic's editor is not about Signal itself, as security experts clarify.
Blaming Signal for the security breach in the chat where US airstrikes were planned against Houthi rebels is deemed incorrect by experts like Kenn White and Matt Green.
The issue in SignalGate is attributed to operator error in inviting untrusted contacts into a confidential conversation rather than a flaw in Signal's technology.
Using consumer apps like Signal for highly sensitive government communications poses risks due to potential vulnerabilities in non-restricted devices.
The Trump administration's discussion on Signal highlights concern about using unauthorized platforms and devices for classified military operations.
Issues like disappearing message features in apps like Signal pose challenges for meeting federal record retention laws in government communications.
The involvement of high-level officials like Pete Hegseth in conversations on Signal raises questions about proper security protocols for classified information.
Signal's use in the cabinet chat points to the necessity for stricter control over software and devices in government agencies like the Department of Defense.
Experts emphasize the importance of maintaining security standards and ensuring sensitive information is protected, regardless of its classification status.
Despite criticism following the SignalGate scandal, Signal itself remains highly recommended by security experts for secure communications in high-risk environments.