A naukri.com initiative
Medium
2w
255
Image Credit: Medium
Smart Contracts vs Traditional Contracts: Key Differences Explained
- Traditional contracts are written on paper, signed by hand, and enforced through legal systems while smart contracts are self-executing agreements written in code and run on blockchain platforms.
- Traditional contracts require manual execution based on parties fulfilling obligations, while smart contracts execute automatically when predefined conditions are met.
- Smart contracts offer transparency through visible terms on a blockchain, while traditional contracts may have information asymmetry or misunderstandings.
- Execution of traditional contracts can take days with legal fees and third-party involvement, whereas smart contracts execute near-instantly, reducing costs significantly.
- Smart contracts are immutable once deployed, providing protection against unauthorized alterations, while traditional contracts may be altered, forged, or lost.
- Enforcement of traditional contracts relies on legal systems, leading to time-consuming disputes, while smart contracts have automatic enforcement with little room for dispute.
- Smart contracts democratize access to global business opportunities and are secure by design due to the tamper-resistant nature of blockchain records.
- Smart contracts are expected to become more prevalent as blockchain technology matures, offering automation, transparency, and security advantages over traditional contracts.
- Businesses considering smart contracts should consult legal experts and experienced developers to navigate complexities and ensure proper implementation.
- Understanding the differences between smart contracts and traditional contracts is crucial for businesses looking to optimize their agreement processes and unlock new efficiencies.
Read Full Article
15 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app