A naukri.com initiative
Dev
2w
17
Image Credit: Dev
Syncfusion vs. Other Angular UI Libraries: Why We Chose Syncfusion in a Large Project
- In a large enterprise project involving Angular, .NET, SQL Server, and Azure, Syncfusion was chosen over Angular Material, PrimeNG, Kendo UI, and NG-Zorro for its comprehensive and enterprise-focused features.
- Syncfusion stood out with over 80+ UI components, excellent data grid support, advanced data visualization, and robust document processing capabilities specifically tailored for enterprise applications.
- Key criteria considered during evaluation included component coverage, performance with large data, Angular integration, customization options, documentation, and backend compatibility with .NET services.
- Syncfusion excelled in performance with large datasets, seamless Angular 17 integration, reporting and document generation capabilities, excellent support and documentation, unified design language, and a licensing model that fit the project's needs.
- The article also includes installation and usage examples of Syncfusion components in Angular, React, and Vue frameworks, demonstrating its versatility across different platforms.
- Advantages of Syncfusion include a wide range of enterprise-ready components, high performance with large datasets, support for multiple frameworks, and extensive documentation.
- On the downside, advanced features may require a paid license, but Syncfusion's overall advantages make it ideal for enterprise and data-heavy applications.
- Ultimately, Syncfusion was chosen for its enterprise readiness, while PrimeNG and Angular Material were recommended for general UI needs based on project specifics like size, complexity, and budget.
Read Full Article
1 Like
For uninterrupted reading, download the app