Education services website Chegg, once a student’s best friend, is struggling to stay afloat, with its stock price plummeting a staggering 99% by November 2024.The company also laid off 441 employees in the summer and 300 more in November.
Kent State University published a study surveying 71 students about their use of AI in academia. Forty-seven per cent of the group comprised upper-level undergraduates aged 21-23, 26% were sophomores, and the rest were older graduate students.
48% of the students reported a ‘significant improvement’ using AI tutoring systems, study scheduling apps and language learning apps using AI.
AI-native education tools are already under progress, with Eureka Labs being one such company. They have begun working on a course that teaches students to develop an AI Storyteller, which is built on Python, C and CUDA.
CEO of IUgroup, the European university group, Sven Schutt has said they have implemented an advanced AI tutor called Syntea, that delivers personalised education for a large group of students. Schutt mentioned that 20-30% of students have yet to use it.
Earlier this year, a research injected 100% AI written submissions into five undergraduate modules for a BSc degree at a reputable UK university. It was found that 94% of the AI submissions were undetected.
The use of AI-generated content in assignments and tests is a well-known problem, but a study adds to the concerns with grades awarded to AI submissions higher than real human students.
While several universities have restricted the use of these AI tools, some have welcomed the integration of AI into study, essays, and other assignments.
AI cannot replace pedagogues, but its implementation in schools can act as a brilliant technological push so that pedagogy can be better and more meaningful than ever.
If AI can transform education in low-resourced schools, especially in developing countries like India, it is imperative to design these products while keeping accessibility and ease of use in mind.