The Phillips curve, a significant concept in modern macroeconomics, has been extensively covered in textbooks and relied upon by central banks worldwide.
Originating from the work of A. W. Phillips, the curve initially showed an inverse correlation between wage inflation and unemployment rate.
Early proponents like Samuelson and Solow expanded the model to include general price inflation and established a causal framework.
Policymakers embraced the Phillips curve in the 1960s, aiming to balance inflation and unemployment.
The 1970s saw the theory challenged by stagflation, leading to adjustments in the model to account for supply shocks and expectations.
Critiques by Friedman and Phelps highlighted flaws, the model's reliance on expectations, and the natural rate of unemployment.
The Phillips curve adapted to include expectations, leading to a short-run relationship but no long-run trade-off.
Mainstream macroeconomics pivoted to incorporate critiques, reshaping the model while avoiding its fundamental rejection.
Critics argue the Phillips curve has become un-falsifiable, akin to pseudo-science, due to constant adjustments to maintain validity.
Despite its shortcomings, the enduring popularity of the Phillips curve persists in academia, policymaking, and economics circles.