Some of the best apps with desktop-class layouts and experiences on iPad are web apps rather than native iPad apps, due to cost-saving measures, App Store policies, and young coders turning to the web for projects.
Tech companies prioritize 'build once, ship everywhere' strategies with web apps for cross-platform accessibility, leading to web versions often being more feature-rich than native iPad apps.
Apple's App Store policies, iPadOS limitations, and lack of native, modern iPad apps from popular services contribute to the dominance of web apps over iPad-specific apps.
The rise of web apps is not limited to iPadOS but also prevalent on desktop platforms, with the Mac ecosystem still showing a vibrant indie app market compared to the iPad.
Web apps offer superior multitasking and experiences on visionOS compared to iPadOS, highlighting the limitations and lack of optimization for the iPad.
Examples like Todoist, Readwise Reader, and Shortwave demonstrate the significant differences in features, usability, and experience between their iPad and web versions.
Developers struggle with prioritizing native iPad app development due to limited resources, Apple's policies, and the overall appeal and reach of web apps and cross-platform services.
The decline of groundbreaking native iPad apps is attributed to Apple's choices, and despite some exceptional indie apps, the overall iPad app ecosystem lacks innovation and standout applications.
The author questions the value of investing in an iPad for productivity when relying heavily on web apps and cross-platform services, suggesting that a Mac might be a more suitable choice for many professional users.
The future of iPadOS and its competitiveness in the productivity space remains uncertain, leading to doubts about the platform's evolution and effectiveness for non-artistic, professional users.
The shift towards web apps over native iPad apps raises concerns about the iPad's role as a productivity device and its ability to meet the needs of a diverse user base in the evolving technological landscape.