Minimalism in design is often praised for its elegance and efficiency, but it raises questions about whose values and aesthetics are being prioritized.
Minimalist design, with its emphasis on clarity and hierarchy, reflects historical and cultural ideals rooted in dominance and control.
The simplicity of minimalism can be seen as a form of subtle oppression, excluding those whose cultures prioritize ornamentation and symbolism.
Neutral design is a myth as minimalism can feel sterile or alienating to cultures valuing complexity and narrative.
Symbols in minimalist design create a private language that may exclude those unfamiliar with the cues.
Brutalist design challenges minimalism by embracing asymmetry and visual noise, reflecting the complexity of real life.
Typography choices in design, like the preference for sans-serif fonts, carry cultural connotations and influence perceptions.
Minimalism reflects a desire for control and order, potentially silencing emotional and chaotic elements of design.
Language choices in minimalist design, like sparse microcopy, reflect cultural values and can impact user experience.
To achieve inclusive design, designers must question the universal application of minimalism and embrace pluralistic design approaches.