Trunk-based development focuses on keeping code changes integrated into a single main branch. Developers make frequent, small updates directly to the trunk, fostering a continuous integration environment.
Feature-based development incorporates the use of separate branches for individual features or tasks. Each developer or team works within an isolated branch, allowing them to build, test, and refine their work independently before merging it into the main codebase.
Feature-based development offers an agile structure that benefits long-term projects, emphasizing incremental progress and iterative development. However, it also has several disadvantages, including merge conflicts, slower release cycles, and higher coordination requirements.
Greater flexibility for developers, enhanced customization capabilities, and controlled releases and code quality are some of the benefits of FBD.
Merge conflicts and integration issues, slower release cycles, and higher coordination requirements are some of the cons of FBD.
Trunk-based development offers advantages such as faster feedback and iteration, reduced merge conflicts, and boosted organizational performance. However, it also has challenges to manage, including a higher risk of instability and the requirement for strong CI/CD practices.
The decision between trunk-based and feature-based development comes down to team structure, project complexity, and deployment goals. Many organizations find success by using a mix of both models.
Ultimately, the decision depends on immediate project needs and long-term objectives.