Venture capitalists who tweet often may not be the best choice for funding, as they may prioritize self-promotion over offering valuable advice and support.
VC firms primarily focus on keeping their Limited Partners happy, which can sometimes lead to prioritizing management fees and fund performance over founders' needs.
The venture capital industry is currently oversaturated with too many firms and investors, leading to a potential shakeout of below-average players.
Despite the significant investment amounts, venture capitalists often conduct minimal due diligence before funding a startup.
The value-add provided by VCs to founders is often limited and sporadic, with high expectations set during the initial investment.
Founders should be cautious if VCs have large portfolios as it may limit the time and attention they can dedicate to each company.
Venture capital can attract individuals with self-serving motives, and founders need to perform due diligence on their potential investors.
The traditional 2% management fee and 20% profit-sharing model in VC is likely to face downward fee pressure in the future.
Hiring ex-FAANG VC partners may not always add significant value for early-stage founders due to their non-technical roles and bureaucratic experience.
Founders should have a clear funding roadmap in mind based on industry benchmarks and milestones to navigate fundraising effectively.
Watching the share price, not just the valuation, is crucial for founders and investors to gauge the actual returns on their investment.