Users tend to tolerate poor usability in products that are highly valuable or necessary, a concept known as the Utility Over Usability Effect.
The article introduces a quadrant diagram categorizing products based on their utility and usability, highlighting how users interact with each category.
Examples like Amazon and Adobe demonstrate how high utility can overshadow poor usability, leading users to endure subpar experiences.
The article discusses how users accept bad UX in government, university, and bureaucratic systems due to lack of alternatives.
The illusion of usability, where aesthetics mask poor UX, is explored, showing how high utility and aesthetics can create an illusion of usability.
The Utility Over Usability Effect serves as a strategic advantage for companies in high-utility, low-usability spaces, allowing room for experimentation but with limitations.
Resource allocation and market considerations are advised based on the value and uniqueness of the product within its market.
The key takeaway emphasizes that while bad UX may be tolerated temporarily, usability becomes crucial once a better alternative with equal utility emerges.
Companies should assess when to prioritize usability investments based on market dynamics and user tolerance levels.
The article concludes that user tolerance for bad UX is not indefinite, and usability can become the deciding factor once a superior alternative is available.