In the TypeScript debate of 'TypeScript Type vs Interface,' 'Type' comes out as the winner due to its flexibility, expressive power, and alignment with modern practices.
Type and interface both define object shapes or function signatures, but type offers more versatility in describing unions, primitives, tuples, mapped types, and conditional types.
Type is safer and prevents accidental redefinitions, while interface supports declaration merging which can lead to hard-to-debug surprises.
Type can extend both types and interfaces, making it more consistent for various scenarios, especially in functional and React patterns.
Although type is generally preferred, interface still holds value in public APIs, libraries, OOP patterns, and classes that implement contracts.
In OOP-heavy codebases, interface is favored for its semantic clarity and support for extension via extends or declaration merging.
Type in TypeScript excels in handling complex scenarios like unions, tuples, mapped and conditional types, making it a preferred choice in most cases.
Unless exposing a public OOP-style API or requiring declaration merging, it is recommended to stick with type for better consistency and clarity in codebases.
For more insights on TypeScript practices, the article suggests exploring topics like asynchronous JavaScript, overloading vs overriding, and effective use of 'as const' in TypeScript.
Overall, the article advocates for the usage of 'type' over 'interface' in TypeScript codebases, emphasizing its superior handling of various type scenarios and prevention of unexpected behaviors.