Soft power operates through intangible and indirect means like cultural appeal, governmental policies, or ideological alignment.
Soft power co-opts instead of coercing, and shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction rather than through coercion or payment.
Soft power is defined as the ability of a country to get other countries to want what it wants.
Soft power involves building favorable perceptions and relationships, promoting cultural and ideological values, and having capabilities for diplomatic networking among other factors.
Soft power has limitations such as being less tangible and direct, not guaranteed outcomes, and dependence on target audience receptivity.
Joseph Nye suggests the most effective approach to foreign policy in the 21st century is a mix of hard and soft power, also known as smart power.
Smart power is a strategic combination of hard and soft power resources in the new context of power diffusion.
The balance between hard and soft power mechanisms can be challenging to integrate, as they often clash.
In Romania, the union of Wallachia and Moldova was achieved not through soft power alone, but strategic blend of legal maneuvering, international support, and military actions.
Overall, while hard power may assert authority, it lacks the galvanizing effect of soft power, although there is only so much soft power can do on its own.